Unknown vulnerability in Tor before 0.1.0.10 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary memory and possibly key information from the exit server's process space.

Tor 0.1.0.13 and earlier, and experimental versions 0.1.1.4-alpha and earlier, does not reject certain weak keys when using ephemeral Diffie-Hellman (DH) handshakes, which allows malicious Tor servers to obtain the keys that a client uses for other systems in the circuit.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 allows remote attackers to identify hidden services via a malicious Tor server that attempts a large number of accesses of the hidden service, which eventually causes a circuit to be built through the malicious server.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 allows remote attackers to spoof log entries or possibly execute shell code via strings with non-printable characters.

Unspecified vulnerability in the directory server (dirserver) in Tor before 0.1.1.20 allows remote attackers to cause an unspecified denial of service via unknown vectors.

Integer overflow in Tor before 0.1.1.20 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted large inputs, which result in a buffer overflow when elements are added to smartlists.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 creates "internal circuits" primarily consisting of nodes with "useful exit nodes," which allows remote attackers to conduct unspecified statistical attacks.

TLS handshakes in Tor before 0.1.1.20 generate public-private keys based on TLS context rather than the connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks on the encryption keys.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 does not sufficiently obey certain firewall options, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for dirservers, direct connections, or proxy servers.

The privoxy configuration file in Tor before 0.1.1.20, when run on Apple OS X, logs all data via the "logfile", which allows attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 supports server descriptors that contain hostnames instead of IP addresses, which allows remote attackers to arbitrarily group users by providing preferential address resolution.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 uses improper logic to validate the "OR" destination, which allows remote attackers to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack via unspecified vectors.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 kills the circuit when it receives an unrecognized relay command, which causes network circuits to be disbanded. NOTE: while this item is listed under the "Security fixes" section of the developer changelog, the developer clarified on 20060707 that this is only a self-DoS. Therefore this issue should not be included in CVE

Tor client before 0.1.1.20 prefers entry points based on is_fast or is_stable flags, which could allow remote attackers to be preferred over nodes that are identified as more trustworthy "entry guard" (is_guard) systems by directory authorities.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 does not validate that a server descriptor's fingerprint line matches its identity key, which allows remote attackers to spoof the fingerprint line, which might be trusted by users or other applications.

Tor before 0.1.1.20 uses OpenSSL pseudo-random bytes (RAND_pseudo_bytes) instead of cryptographically strong RAND_bytes, and seeds the entropy value at start-up with 160-bit chunks without reseeding, which makes it easier for attackers to conduct brute force guessing attacks.

Unspecified vulnerability in (1) Tor 0.1.0.x before 0.1.0.18 and 0.1.1.x before 0.1.1.23, and (2) ScatterChat before 1.0.2, allows remote attackers operating a Tor entry node to route arbitrary Tor traffic through clients or cause a denial of service (flood) via unspecified vectors.

Tor before 0.2.1.22, and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.7-alpha, uses deprecated identity keys for certain directory authorities, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to compromise the anonymity of traffic sources and destinations.

Tor 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.7-alpha, when functioning as a directory mirror, does not prevent logging of the client IP address upon detection of erroneous client behavior, which might make it easier for local users to discover the identities of clients in opportunistic circumstances by reading log files.

Tor before 0.2.1.22, and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.7-alpha, when functioning as a bridge directory authority, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about bridge identities and bridge descriptors via a dbg-stability.txt directory query.

Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.28 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.20-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha does not properly check the amount of compression in zlib-compressed data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large compression factor.

Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha does not properly manage key data in memory, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging the ability to read memory that was previously used by a different process.

Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.